RootData Exchange Rankings

Rankings Portal

• Click to visit: Top Cryptocurrency Exchanges Ranked by Transparency

Platform Features

Differing from traditional trading volume-oriented ranking systems, the RootData Exchange Rankings adopt "information transparency" as one of the core evaluation dimensions, moving beyond the "volume-only" mindset to establish a more comprehensive and multidimensional assessment framework.

• Real-Time Rankings: Automatically calculated and updated by algorithms

• Transparency Scoring: Breaks information asymmetry, making asset flows and decision-making logic of exchanges clearly visible

• Multi-Dimensional Data: Constructs a comprehensive evaluation model covering seven core indicators—including information transparency, wealth effect, asset quality, liquidity depth, and compliance security—quantifying the overall strength of exchanges on a 100-point scale

Methodology for Composite Index Calculation

The exchange rankings employ a comprehensive scoring system, with key assessment dimensions including:

Part 1: Liquidity Assessment Dimensions

1. Liquidity Score (20%)

• Evaluation Criteria: Standardized assessment of market depth based on multi‑source validated order book data

• Core Metric: Execution efficiency for orders ranging from $100 to $200,000

• Significance: Reflects the exchange’s price stability and slippage control capability across different order sizes

2. Trading Volume Score (20%)

• Data Basis: 24‑hour reported trading volume

• Data Cleansing: Machine learning algorithms are applied to identify and filter suspicious or abnormal trading activity to the greatest extent possible, aiming to restore authentic trading behavior

• Significance: Represents genuine market activity and user trading demand

3. Confidence Score (10%)

• Evaluation Target: Assesses the accuracy of reported trading volume by integrating liquidity, traffic, and trading activity to assign confidence levels to trading pairs

• Verification Method: Cross‑validation of liquidity data and actual trading activity

• Significance: Enhances data accuracy and transparency, serving as a reference for users to judge data reliability

Part 2: Asset Value Assessment Dimensions

1. Early‑listed Projects (10%)

Aims to evaluate the exchange's asset discovery capability and project selection quality.

• Number of Well‑funded Projects: Count of early‑listed projects that have raised significant capital

• RD Index Top 50 Tracked Projects: First‑listing rights for projects receiving high market attention in the RD Index Top 50

  Market Capitalization of Listed Projects: Quantity and quality of high‑market‑cap projects at the time of initial listing

• Number of Unique Assets: Count of differentiated assets listed exclusively or earlier than on other platforms

2. Exchange Transparency Score (10%)

Aims to evaluate the quality of an exchange's disclosure of core project asset information.

• Token unlock information disclosure

• Key project calendar events

• Richness of project tags

• Related news coverage

• User reviews

• Team information completeness

• Funding information disclosure

• Overall transparency

3. Wealth Potential Performance Score (20%)

Aims to evaluate the historical market performance and growth potential of assets listed on the exchange.

• Growth Dimension: Evaluation of the increase in project market capitalization relative to its initial listing price.

• Stability Requirement: Assessment of sustained performance over 30 days or more to filter out short-term speculation.

• Core Value: Reflects the exchange's long-term value creation capability after listing assets.

4. Qualitative Factor Score (10%)

Evaluates the compliance and credibility of the exchange

• Operational Duration: Years in operation and market experience

• Public Audits: Third-party security audit reports

• Licensing: Compliance licenses and regulatory qualifications